Quote:
Originally Posted by evil_genius_180
Shatner cheesy? I think not. 
(meanwhile, "KHAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNN" is just plain cheesy.  ) Plus, he's friggin' hilarious in Airplane II: The Sequel. |
the SHAT is cheesy. but awesome-cheesy! he also has great films, i felt that STVI really captured the essence of his character, for example.
And Denny Crane, Ham-extraordinare. Of course he's cheesy - its why we love him!
Quote:
Originally Posted by evil_genius_180
(even though no self respecting Vulcan would frown.)
|
more like a severe, emotionless stare. But on a vulcan, we call it frowning. Disbelief if he's raising an eyebrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taranis
Well for the time the sets where not cheap "(at least not the Enterprise sets )" Star Trek was always meant to be serious and began that with The Cage.
I also will say that the only TREK film I have found weakest was the newest trek film on a few levels.
|
The sets were brilliant, considering the budget available (or lack thereoff). But the age shows. And the primary colors were
ghastley!!
brilliant for its time, but still very much a part of its time.
ST 2009 wasn't cheesy, but it was a failure. The sets were amazing, the character and plot had holes you could drive a truck through. But i would watch that again and again rather than see ST:V again :P
