TAS Star Trek Robot Cargo

[Darrell Lawrence]

The Robot Cargo from TAS Star Trek is now available here in LW format.

[evil_genius_180]

Have I told you lately that you're my hero?

[alt1701]

working on this one, but yours is great

[Darrell Lawrence]

Note the other new download as well

[evil_genius_180]

Dude, I'm still working on converting the Robo Freighter.

BTW, what's the size comp between the Enterprise and the Robo Freighter? I plan on doing a series of pics with your freighter and ships from my fleet.

[alt1701]

Note the other new download as well

sweet!

[Darrell Lawrence]

Originally Posted by evil_genius_180

Dude, I'm still working on converting the Robo Freighter.

BTW, what's the size comp between the Enterprise and the Robo Freighter? I plan on doing a series of pics with your freighter and ships from my fleet.

I always go by basic window size myself

[evil_genius_180]

Originally Posted by Warrior

I always go by basic window size myself

I used to do that but it doesn't always work with Trek stuff. Especially when you do TOS and TNG-era stuff. I mean, the Voyager is larger than the TOS Enterprise and has seven less decks. So, if you do that with the Enterprise by window size, you get a Voyager that's smaller than the Enterprise, which is wrong. I guess the crew of the Voyager is about 6 meters tall, because the ceilings are not any higher over their heads than the ceilings of the Enterprise were over the heads of its crew.

[Darrell Lawrence]

Actually, the Intrepid Class (Voyager) is about the same size (actually a tad smaller) as the TOS Connie.

The Connie is near the same HEIGHT as a Sovereign Class! The Sovy is a lot longer and wider though.

[evil_genius_180]

Well, the Star Trek Encyclopedia's size chart shows the Voyager a tad larger....

Either way, they don't always (ever) get their crap accurate in Trek. The Defiant is 30 meters tall and has 4 or 5 decks (depending on your source). Explain why the ceilings don't tower over everybody's head.

[Darrell Lawrence]

...which is why I go by windows

[evil_genius_180]

That doesn't always work!!

Do you accept file uploads in .rar format or just .zip? Because I have both and I've found that WinRAR compresses them to a sizeably smaller file.

[Darrell Lawrence]

.rar works.

[evil_genius_180]

I was hoping you'd say that.

[evil_genius_180]

Your upload center won't let me upload a .rar file. It says it's an invalid extension.

[Darrell Lawrence]

That's weird. It's suppose to allow both zip and rar formats. I myself have both up on there.

[evil_genius_180]

Well, it said I couldn't do it. I might zip the .rar so it'll still be small. Then you can extract the .rar and post it.

But all of that's not happening until after dinner.

I keep forgetting to ask; did you get your computer fixed/replaced?

[Darrell Lawrence]

Well... I just uploaded a RAR file and it worked fine. Try it again

Seriously.

[evil_genius_180]

I zipped the .rar and it uploaded it just fine. Of course, it is your web site.

I don't know what the problem was earlier. Maybe the site was just be stupid at that time. The good thing about zipping the .rar is that it's slightly smaller and uploaded a little more quickly.

[Darrell Lawrence]

I'd still like you to try the RAR again.

[evil_genius_180]

Did it. It still said it was an invalid file extension. Maybe as the site owner you can upload anything you want.

[Darrell Lawrence]

Nah. I did it from a test handle I have here.

[evil_genius_180]

In that case, I'm at a loss to explain. I just know I kept getting the same message, invalid file exetension .rar, or something along those lines. When I did the .zip, it was one shot, one kill.

Very Cool!